INFORMATION
DATA BANK
Existing Information
(This might consist
of records, receipts, personnel records, changes, reports, census data,
agency and school records, state and national Web sites.)
|
What it
Measures
|
Advantages
|
Disadvantages
|
Examples
|
| Insight
into programs that cannot be observed in any other way |
Readily
available
Minimal cost
Data available
on a wide variety of characteristics
Can be accessed
on a continuing basis
Descriptive
data
|
User
may need to sort, discriminate and correlate
Takes time to
find sources
Figures may
be dated or represent estimates rather than actual accounts
Does not reveal
individual values beliefs or reasons underlying current trends
|
Past
plans of work are reviewed to determine program trends or changes.
Census data
are read to note family demographic trends. |
Back
to top
Case Studies
|
What it
Measures
|
Advantages
|
Disadvantages
|
Examples
|
| Experiences
and characteristics of selected persons in a project (generally
utilized with a small number of people) |
Procedures
evolve as work progresses
No confining
categories or classifications
Allows depth
or insight into relationships and personal feelings
Can be effectively
used in combination with other methods, such as survey and observation
Unique opportunity
for in-depth study of organization, group, etc., over time
Can be tailored
to specific situations
|
Requires
absolute accuracy
Can be very
subjective
Time consuming;
requires extensive amounts of data; several cases are needed for
best analysis
Focus is on
a limited number of cases; cannot necessarily be generalized to
larger community
Not suitable
as a method in isolation; best for a background or as a guide to
further study
Several observation
techniques (e.g., sampling) are available, but must be learned
|
A
few participants from each program are visited about their experience.
Their colleagues
are interviewed.
Three families
are followed for a six- month period to seek changes.
|
Back
to top
Written Surveys
|
What it
Measures
|
Advantages
|
Disadvantages
|
Examples
|
| Opinions,
attitudes, beliefs, behaviors, reactions and attributes, in response
to specific questions
|
Efficient
for volume of information collected
People more
likely to provide frank, thoughtful, honest information, tension-
free situation
Gives people
more time to complete the questionnaire
All respondents
receive exact same questions in printed form - free from bias
A sample can
be used to provide much information about a population
Can provide
an opportunity for many people to be involved in the decision
making process
|
Low
response rate
One or two
follow-ups are usually needed for a good return
Questionnaire
must be simple and easy to understand
Difficult
to summarize open-ended questions
Accurate mailing
lists are required
Overuse of
this method may make some people reluctant to respond privacy,
confidentiality, and anonymity must be assured
Can be expensive
and time consuming
Scope is limited
Results may
be misleading if only respondents who are are interested in topic
respond
|
Parents
are asked about their needs for childcare.
Childcare
providers rate and rank types of training they need.
Youth are
asked to rate their concerns. Their responses are compared to
parental responses.
|
Back
to top
Telephone Surveys
|
What it
Measures
|
Advantages
|
Disadvantages
|
Examples
|
| Opinions,
attitudes, beliefs, behaviors, reactions and attributes, in response
to specific questions
|
Response
rate is generally high
Less expensive
to program
Cost is competitive
with mail survey
Speed and
efficient source of data
Researcher
can provide clarification on unclear questions
Respondents
are more relaxed with a stranger by telephone than face to face
Interviewer
can read questions from script and take notes without concern
of distracting respondents
Can be qualitative
or quantitative |
Time
consuming
Telephone
numbers are needed
Proportion
of unlisted numbers or households without phones may cause frame
error
Questions
should still be simple and easy to understand (no more than five
response categories)
Interviewer's
voice or identity may lead to biased results
Respondents
may feel interview is an invasion of privacy
|
Participants
who drop out of a program are assessed for reasons.
A sample of
school parents are asked how they would like to be involved in
schools.
Welfare moms
are asked to rate aspects of their work stress and childcare.
|
Back
to top
Personal Interviews
|
What it
Measures
|
Advantages
|
Disadvantages
|
Examples
|
| Person's
responses, views and perceptions
|
Easier
to reach those who are considered unreachable (e.g., the poor,
homeless, high status, mobile, etc.)
May be easier
to reach specific individuals (e.g., community leaders, etc.)
Higher response
rate
More personalized
approach
Easier to
ask open-ended questions, use probes and pick up on nonverbal
cues
Can be qualitative
or quantitative
|
May
be most expensive method
Slowest method
of data collection and analysis
Responses
may be less honest and thoughtful
Interview's
presence and characteristics may bias results
Interviewer
should go to location of respondent
Respondents
who prefer anonymity may be inhibited by personal approach
May reach
a smaller sample
Extension
responses must be sorted and coded
|
Program
participants are interviewed about program and instructor.
Fathers are
asked how they are involved in their child's life.
Teens are
asked to voice their concerns about peer pressure.
|
Back
to top
Group Interviews
|
What it
Measures
|
Advantages
|
Disadvantages
|
Examples
|
| Group's
responses, views, perceptions; often consensus
|
Less
expensive and faster than personal interviews
Personalized
approach
Group members
stimulate each other
Grouping similar
people together assures comfort
|
Respondents
who prefer anonymity may be inhibited by personal approach
Input may
be unbalanced because some group members dominate group members,
and interviewer can bias responses
Data more
difficult to analyze and summarize
|
A
focus group is conducted with members of a divorce education class
to understand the effectiveness of instructor and value of content.
A school staff
discusses inservice needs.
A community
coalition assesses impact of Extension leadership on progress
toward goals.
Incarcerated
parents discuss needs as a long-distance parent.
|
Back
to top
Observation
|
What it
Measures
|
Advantages
|
Disadvantages
|
Examples
|
| Particular
physical and verbal behaviors
|
Setting
is natural, flexible and unstructured
Evaluator
may make his/her identity known or remain anonymous
Evaluator
may actively participate or observe passively
Can be combined
with other data collection methods
Most useful
for studying a "small unit" such as a classroom, council, etc.
|
The
evaluator has less control over the situation in a natural environment
Hawthorne
effect -- if group members are aware that they are being observed,
resulting behavior may affect observations
Cannot be
generalized to entire population unless a plan for representativeness
is developed
If observer
chooses to be involved in the activity, he/she may lose objectivity
Not realistic
for use with large groups
Several observation
techniques (e.g., sampling) are available, but must be learned
|
Record
how frequently 4-H campers use appropriate safety measures.
|
Back
to top
Mass Media/Public
Hearings/Public Forums
|
What it
Measures
|
Advantages
|
Disadvantages
|
Examples
|
| Opinions,
ideas
|
Allows
all citizens to have an opportunity to respond and voice opinion
Teleconferencing,
call-in and town meeting methods are quick methods of obtaining
input
|
The
extremes of a population (those definitely "for" or "against")
tend to respond
Use of public
television and teleconferencing is limited to those who have access
to public television and a phone
Public hearings
are time consuming, especially for the interviewers
Summary and
analysis of data can be difficult
Response to
public hearing is affected by location, distance and date
Not everyone
is comfortable in this setting
Large population
pockets can be left out unintentionally
|
Use
of public television to address the national issue of "youth at
risk."
Public hearing
or community meeting concerning environmental issues or use of
pesticides and water quality.
Public forum
to discuss demolition of community center to build a parking lot.
Community
forum to identify concerns of youth.
|
Adapted
from: The Answers to Program Evaluation Workbook, North Central
Region Extension Publication # 751. January, 1997.
Back
to top
|